Team retainers
Choose the team shape that fits the product and the pace you can support
Each retainer is tied to a practical team structure. The question is not how much software you want in theory, but what level of progress you can fund comfortably, sprint after sprint. The larger team, if one is needed, is still coordinated through a single technical lead so the working relationship stays straightforward.
Primary pathStarter team
US$900 per month from
Team Principal engineer with product and delivery guidance
Best for Prototype, first release, or an early MVP
Pace A calm early sprint rhythm with meaningful weekly progress
A lean team shape for getting something real in front of users without committing to more monthly spend than the product should carry yet.
Best when the product needs a clear technical foundation, early user feedback, and steady progress rather than a burst of unfocused build activity.
- You still work through one technical lead, even if other specialist help is brought in as the product grows.
- Well suited to clients who want to start with a practical skeleton app and improve it incrementally.
- Keeps the monthly cost low enough to sustain while the product proves its value.
- Works well when requirements are expected to change as real users respond.
Start with a paid kickoffRetainer-firstCore product team
US$3,200 per month from
Team Senior engineer, delivery management, and specialist support when needed
Best for MVP through early growth
Pace Regular sprint-by-sprint improvement with room to adapt direction
A balanced team for products that need dependable shipping, thoughtful technical decisions, and enough delivery structure to keep momentum without waste.
This is the natural shape for a product that has moved beyond the first prototype and now needs disciplined iteration over time.
- The client relationship remains simple, with one technical lead coordinating the wider team.
- Suitable for founders who want a product to improve every sprint at a sustainable pace.
- Good for products with active users, evolving priorities, and a need for clearer planning and execution.
- Can be expanded carefully as the product and budget mature.
Discuss a core teamFor greater pace or complexityScaled delivery team
US$7,600 per month from
Team Multiple engineers with senior oversight and extra specialist roles as needed
Best for Growing products, larger roadmaps, and more demanding delivery programmes
Pace Higher throughput, more parallel work, and deeper technical coverage
A broader team for products that know where they are going and need more implementation capacity without losing clarity, technical leadership, or cost discipline.
Best for products where a small team would become the bottleneck for pace, resilience, or technical complexity.
- The mix of engineers can be tuned toward lower cost or higher expertise depending on what matters most for the product.
- Lets CRITICAL add international expertise carefully instead of growing headcount too quickly.
- Useful when integrations, product breadth, or delivery expectations increase materially.
- Still structured around a sustainable monthly retainer rather than high agency overhead.
Discuss a scaled teamFor existing teamsFractional technical leadership
US$1,400 per month from
Team Experienced engineering leadership layered onto your current team
Best for Existing products that need clearer direction more than extra hands
Pace Better planning, stronger decisions, and calmer execution with the team you already have
A lighter engagement for teams that are already building, but need steadier product and technical leadership before deciding whether to scale implementation capacity.
Ideal when coordination, architecture, prioritisation, or delivery confidence is the real constraint.
- You keep one experienced technical lead as the point of contact rather than managing several separate contributors directly.
- Often the lowest-overhead way to improve software decisions and delivery quality.
- A practical option before committing to a larger multi-person team.
- Helpful for companies that want honest technical stewardship without agency theatre.
Discuss leadership support